Nowadays it is the world of advanced science and technology, people still appreciate the value of our artists such as musicians, painters, writers. In fact, the arts can tell us many stories about life science and technology can not.
Needless to say, science and technology are now being in a gloriously developed period with may inventions that are utilized in life especially smartphones and tablets which people use every second. Truth be told, science and technology have demonstrated plenty of theories as wall as explained various things and phenomena that people had not been capable for thousand years. We do not only recognize the huge roles that science and technology have brought to us but also have to honor the human intelligence. In terms of arts which have been maintained for millenniums. Since the prime human civilization, ancient people were aware of expressing their daily stories by sculpture images on stones. They were arts. Arts can appear with many forms such as poems, pictures, musicians, liberties, etc. According to many documents, arts perform outlooking, idealistic or even purely intellectual moral value of people. By arts, people expected to tell historical stories, traditional culture-custom which they wanted to retain forever. Following these musicians, painters or writers, we are capable deeply comprehends in terms of material and spiritual life of our ancestors. It has come to my attention that our emotions, our spirit have been nourished by the majority of these work.
Besides many positive impacts, science and technology also leads to some not good consequences. Some people have found that science and technology development parallel with the decline part of moral value. The most obvious that people have become unhappier, their mental life have been insipid or even many people have sought to death. Statistics show the molarity rate by suicide is higher in modern society. Meanwhile, governments and optimists have attempted to protect the value of humanism as well as the mental health of citizens base on arts reservations.
In summary, I want to point out that arts have been the nutritious food for the human soul for periods of thousands of years. People have been responsible to reserve and progress these work parallel with science and technology. Therefore, we can live in a really delightful world.
- in today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers what can arts tell us about life that science and technology can not 84
- in many countries people are concerned about the number of children are overweight What do you think and what are your suggest 82
- in today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers what can arts tell us about life that science and technology can not 78
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work What could be the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive and negative development 56
- in today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers what can arts tell us about life that science and technology can not 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...na that people had not been capable for thousand years. We do not only recognize the hug...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of citizens base on arts reservations. In summary, I want to point out that art...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, may, really, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, in fact, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27320954907 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79068288816 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554376657825 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1296826349 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311155117229 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947717523604 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102121358663 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247265759678 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178259157954 0.056905535591 313% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.