In today's world, private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Contrary to common beliefs, the body which is carrying out, as well as financially responsible for, experiments is the private companies and not the governmental ones. On one hand, industry-supported research receives substantial subsidies and drives the evolution of entire economic sectors. On the other hand, it begs the question whether companies are willing to pay for the discoveries that can potentially hurt their profit and should the public trust those results.
To assess the advantages that the private companies offer, we must take the amount of investment into consideration. Business corporations have made impressive progress over the past decades to the point that they are now called giants. By contrast, government grants for scientific research are lagging behind due to the fact that the focus has been shifted towards the military, and even education does not get enough attention. Therefore, if scientists are paid by private companies, they will have the freedom to perform all sorts of experiments, along with clinical trials, which are required to realize their innovative idea. In the case where such an idea can be commercialized to generate profit, the industry, unlike governmental agencies, is fully equipped with plants and production lines to produce on a massive scale.
Nevertheless, these advantages do not alter the fact that science is not as lucrative as other fields. If an organization wanted to make money, petroleum or soccer teams, for instance, would be better choices to invest which bring both profit and marketing value to the brand. With regards to the public, the members would be sceptical as to why an industry would fund something that damages the industry itself. Assuming a soft drink company sponsored a research on nutrition or a petrochemical was behind a research on the environment, it’s questionable whether the scientists have the authority to consider every possible aspect to the problem, even the one that might bring conflict of interest. Even when the scientists have such rights to do so, people will be reluctant to put their faith in the validity of any discovery made.
Taking into account both the pros and cons, I come to the conclusion that although scepticism is inevitable, more research being done by the private sectors will bring more innovation and improvement to everyday life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-03 | riyapatel30 | 84 | view |
2023-04-26 | chinh11111 | 89 | view |
2022-05-25 | vialia | 73 | view |
2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | 78 | view |
2021-08-03 | tamle | 78 | view |
- There is no need to go out to see live performance because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 11
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- In most successful companies some people think that communication between employers and workers is the most important factor Other people say that other factors are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...mic sectors. On the other hand, it begs the question whether companies are willing to pay for the di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...Assuming a soft drink company sponsored a research on nutrition or a petrochemical was beh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...nutrition or a petrochemical was behind a research on the environment, it’s questionable w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28647214854 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92322374672 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602122015915 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6337835045 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.357142857 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154016291196 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507229315993 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039362438864 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889028657333 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283179274917 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.