In today's world, private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Scientific research plays an important role and no longer predominantly takes place in the public sector. In the present-day world, the majority of scientific research is funded by privately owned corporations instead of central governments. Although this phenomenon suffers from drawbacks, in my point of view, I maintain these advantages prevail over.
Firstly, should private entrepreneurs allocate funds for scientific research, will they contribute to the alleviation of pressure on the national budget. Consequently, governments will have sufficient money to invest in other crucial domains such as healthcare, education, and up-to-date facilities to enhance dwellers’ living standards. Moreover, only in this way will non-government firms gain considerable reputations of having responsibilities to society. For example, before publishing a lipstick into the market, businesses implement a test to analyze the reliability of it based on ingredients and result after trial.
Secondly, science is likely to flourish under the mandate of private companies. Contrary to government policy, professionals have more motivation to implement studies efficiently if they work for non-government because they have plenty of time to experiment on new ideas instead of abiding by a strict 8-hour-per-day schedule. For that reason, the company may quickly reap benefits from research findings and earn revenues, especially with promising projects. Moreover, affluent private corporations do not have to confront with such limited budgets as the government does, therefore, not only does the experiments perform effectively but it also can broaden in scale.
In conclusion, from my perspective, private firms can devote more power to conduct scientific research as a goal and generally have to deal with less “red tape” than the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | riyapatel30 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-26 | chinh11111 | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-25 | vialia | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | tamle | 78 | view |
- 1 People nowadays are encouraged to buy more and more consumer products Some people think that it is good for the economy while others believe that this development will damage the society as a whole Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- many people think that cheap air travel should be encouraged because it gives ordinary people the freedom to travel further however others think that this leads to environmental problem and so air travel should be more expensive in order to discourage peo 92
- It is said that celebrities have a responsibility to set an example for others by their good behaviours Do you agree 84
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditures This money should be used in new housing and road development To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people with a good education and experience in their field decide to move abroad to work Why do you think that is What are the problems caused by this 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aintain these advantages prevail over. Firstly, should private entrepreneurs al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on ingredients and result after trial. Secondly, science is likely to flourish ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, especially with promising projects. Moreover, affluent private corporations ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely but it also can broaden in scale. In conclusion, from my perspective, priv...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88059701493 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.271330604 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671641791045 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7930125674 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222380892755 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735773157673 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042935324576 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128313949423 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155820587198 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aintain these advantages prevail over. Firstly, should private entrepreneurs al...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on ingredients and result after trial. Secondly, science is likely to flourish ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, especially with promising projects. Moreover, affluent private corporations ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely but it also can broaden in scale. In conclusion, from my perspective, priv...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88059701493 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.271330604 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671641791045 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7930125674 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222380892755 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735773157673 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042935324576 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128313949423 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155820587198 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.