Today, TV channels broadcast men’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows.
Why is it the case?
Should TV channels give equal showtime for women’s sport and men’s sport?
In our contemporary world, there has been a climbing unfairness in media coverage between male and female due to two key reasons, and therefore TV channels must increase both quantity and quality for women’s sports coverage.
First and foremost, women’s sports lack a strong fanbase and supporters is the seed of the inequality in airtime between two sexs’ shows. The vast majority of sports fan prefer men’s sports due to their strength, speed and great performance, which is rarely observed in women’s area. In addition, prejudices against women still exist and thus general population still shows discrimination towards them. However, television viewership is not the only explanation for this disparity because in recent years, fanbases of female athletes have been growing but the adjustment in airtime is insignificant. Hence, the deeply rooted prejudices and sexism are clearly shown, especially not only in low-quality shows but also media attention.
Eradicating this gender favoritism is an essential step in the purpose of bringing out equality in sports for women and men, and TV channels must give equal showtime and higher-quality coverage to cope with this issue. Furthermore, equal showtime allocated for female sport events not only arouses fan interest but also sends a message that women’s sports are as worthy as men’s. Whereas this process is happening, TV channels can also choose different approaches that helps increase the quality of women’s sports. This can be achieved by hiring more female employees such as reporters or sportcoasters and enhancing the quality of women’s sports and making it more fastinating by adding more contents and production values such as graphics and interviews. All mentioned factors can contribute to higher viewership, and ultimately, higher levels of excitement for fans.
To summarise what has been stated, discrimination towards females is still available in aspects of our society, especially in sport area. People and sport organisers must be held accountable for demolishing sexism and bringing sex equality to sports in order to create greater, more equal competitions.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 84
- Today TV channels broadcast men s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why is it the case Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54242424242 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91623019166 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2634772676 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.692307692 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440846250186 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149550727606 0.084324248473 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100195437353 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253939584586 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677781483818 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.