The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari

Essay topics:

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The first given linear chart indicates the percentages of households that owned electrical appliances of specifically washing machine, refrigerator, and vacuum cleaner, whilst another depicts the data of the amount of time spent on housework on a weekly basis; and both over the period from 1920 to 2019 of a nation.
Overall, the usage of refrigerator rose significantly from being showed no interest to 100% utilized after 99 years, whereas the time put aside for chores underwent a gradual decrease.
On the one hand, in accordance with the first chart, the year 1920 witnessed washing machine's data took the lead (at precisely 40%) while refrigerator's bottomed out and vacuum cleaner's accounted for 30%. At the end of the period, although the figure for washing machine mostly rose at a uniform pace, it only landed at the least used appliances (at approximately 75%). Nevertheless, the two remaining counterparts, which are refrigerator and vacuum machine, increased significantly, particularly the former reached its peak at 100% in 1980 and the latter in 2000. Both of the figures subsequently sustained their peaks for the next 19 years.
On the other hand, according to the second graph, the time spent on housework plunged gradually from its highest point of 50 hours to its smallest of only 10 hours, which was 5 times lower. In addition, the figure in the period of 1980-2000 remained unchanged.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-27 nguyenhuyendan1133 67 view
2022-06-24 Luis Pham 78 view
2022-05-31 vinh_hoang 60 view
2022-05-31 vinh_hoang view
2022-05-31 vinh_hoang view
Essays by user lannkimm :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14410480349 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91795869449 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624454148472 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4455614582 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.25 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133097218964 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512292837265 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658642829744 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896691992218 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696718402574 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.