The affinity to have famous brands in choosing clothes, car and other item are rising. People love to purchase popular brands due to multiple reasons like social status symbol, peer pressure, corporate manipulation or media portrayal. Although there has some gain for a few parties but I think the fondness to have famous brand is not a good development.
Buying fancy items in daily life has become a social status symbol nowadays. People want to show off his/her lifestyle in social media where peer member comments on it. If the belongings are widely known and luxurious items, then the community people get an idea about how rich or elite the person owing it. This types of display sometimes encourages others to use the similar types of luxury branded goods.
On the other hand, media is playing a gigantic role to promote the idea of branding, as they broadcast different TV or serial where the celebrities are shown wearing costly items. Citizens unintentionally get the feeling about class or standard from the sophisticated portrayal of their favorite actress or models. In many ways media desperately visualize the concepts of happiness lies in consuming great products which biases people to have ecstatic products.
On the contrary, there is another side of the reason for having branded clothings or lifestyle items. In the current world, there are a lots of fake, imitated goods which makes consumers confused. People cannot trust an unknown or less popular item as it may deceive the buyer by vague advertisement. So that natives love to purchase a well-known items even if it is costly to avoid the risk of buying fake items.
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- In many ways media desperately visualize the concepts of happiness lies in consuming great products which biases people to have ecstatic products 78
- Topic More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... items. In the current world, there are a lots of fake, imitated goods which makes con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'item'?
Suggestion: item
...t natives love to purchase a well-known items even if it is costly to avoid the risk ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, well, i think, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00364963504 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60467628256 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9731102661 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9285714286 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188884444142 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630214910997 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506488228532 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110971289818 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595405645417 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... items. In the current world, there are a lots of fake, imitated goods which makes con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'item'?
Suggestion: item
...t natives love to purchase a well-known items even if it is costly to avoid the risk ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, well, i think, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00364963504 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60467628256 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9731102661 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.9285714286 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188884444142 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630214910997 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506488228532 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110971289818 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595405645417 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.