The number of nearly extinct and extinct wild animals and birds are increasing significantly. Although wild animal preservation receives a great concern of social media, there are still not enough attention and resources given to keep them from extinction.
Specifically, citizens are lack of awareness of wild animal and bird protection. First of all, a huge number of people do not know that the wildlife is under a great threat due to human’s interference. The act of overhunting, logging, expanding farmland and the like extremely interferes animal habitats. People are unaware that if some species of the fauna became non-existent, their life on Earth would be affected considerably. Consequently, overhunting and animal trafficking are still happening, even on an international scale. As a result, numerous wild animals and birds are in danger and the loss of biodiversity is at the alarming rate.
In addition to people’s unawareness, governments are overlooking the situation. There are not enough strict laws enacted. For example, people who hunt animals or fell trees illegally after receiving a fine still be able to capture animals or log trees for their commercial purposes. Moreover, there are various underqualified government-run programs to protect wildlife. These programs cost a great amount of money to build infrastructure or conduct research; however, they do not receive enough support or fundings from the authority. Therefore, it is failed to carry on projects or to attract attention from outsiders. As a result, the imbalance of our ecosystem is getting worse and worse over a short period.
From all the above-mentioned, hardly has wildlife preservation received enough attention and resources from human beings and authorities. If we do not take any steps right away, our environment, as well as our home, will be destroyed awfully by our own action.
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44406779661 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20941232815 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3437420077 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163527939924 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475738221222 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313999530542 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100042723248 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381238448002 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.