Topic: To succeed in a business, one needs to know math.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is generally the case that mathematical skills have contributed to the success of entrepreneurs. While this notion can be reasonable for some business people, I opine that for many prosperous companies nowadays, employers do not need to do the calculations themselves.
It is common knowledge that math plays an integral role in operating a business. Firstly, an enormous number of calculations have to be conducted so as to determine the prices both appealing to buyers and sufficient to make the business financially healthy. Without the financial counting of all expenditures, the business people can easily overcharge or undercharge the customers for his products or services. Secondly, to maximize profits, the owners need to make the whole corporation system as cost-efficient as possible. This is why it is math statistics that are crucial to help them make decisions where and how capital should be allocated to. Usually, leaders of the companies pay attention to such figures as they acknowledged future developments of the organizations depend greatly on subsequent financial choices.
However, my belief is that should numeral skills not be one’s forte, it does not mean he or she cannot run a business successfully. The first reason is that employers can hire reliable workers to take charge of the accounting job. In the corporate world, it is not uncommon that the business owner is not the one who works with figures in his company; in fact, he is assisted by subordinates in the finance department. Another compelling reason is that delegating the bookkeeping tasks to employees might be an advisable practice. By doing so, the entrepreneurs can save plenty of time and cognitive space for other important decisions, such as launching a new product or adapting to the dynamic economic climate.
In conclusion, while it is true that mathematics could be of pivotal importance to a thriving company, I do not think its owner has to be adept at mathematical capacities. It would be a wiser investment to employ bookkeepers so that he can have more time for strategic work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 89
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment their manufacturer and their use continue to increase Why is the case How can this be controlled KHANH HOMEWORK MAY 22 56
- The diagram below shows the changes to the town of Seaville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play a musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...er of calculations have to be conducted so as to determine the prices both appealing to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16470588235 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13388667229 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591176470588 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2953254695 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.066666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112604283048 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351460987505 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03378359151 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706044221665 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030698358393 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.