Tourism today creates a variety of problems, such as pollution due to flights, traffic congestion and water pollution. Do you think that governments should impose extra taxes on flights or accommodation to restrict today’s tourism industry? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Today, it is argued that tourism originates problems such as pollution environmentally in air and water, and traffic congestion. However, government have to implement more taxes on air transport or accommodation to limit the tourism sector.
First and foremost, it is believed that tourist activities cause several problematic issue because of flights, traffic jam, and polluting water, and these generate toxic particles in environment. That is to say, this industry needs to use fossil fuel to energize transport, especially flight-based transport and vessels, disposing chemical substances in water and air. For instance, Indonesia depends on international visit as the main source of treasury revenue, consequently this nation relies on petrol as fuel of vessels and planes, resulting the amount of carbon dioxide released in ocean and on atmosphere. Therefore, this increases the acidity of ocean and alters the temperature of climate to be warm.
To tackle this, It is true that authorities should regulate the amount of taxes on flight and accommodation to reduce the detrimental impacts of tourism world, just like environmental taxes. This is because when governments apply a national rule for transport and housing rent agents to pay the amount of money due to the carbon output, this will give a limitation to tourist coming in the country to decrease the number of the aforementioned problem. For example, Japan have implemented carbon taxes since 2019, and this resulted a decline of acid rain and coastal water in 2020. Furthermore, it was caused by this regulation to restrict the traffic congestion, and international flight, being one of the most eco-friendly nations in the world, probably.
In conclusion, it is a firm belief that tourism reveals environment more detrimentally, so that the national regulators should restrict the flight and accommodation of travelling industry. Where possible, authorities should implement eco-friendly tourism.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56146179402 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13754968964 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578073089701 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8561520535 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283863815149 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105386086771 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785650422628 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187297355757 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775741985498 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.