Tourist 2
Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all.
What is your opinion?
Tourism industry in the past decade has witnessed a perceptible surge in numbers insomuch as a plethora of nations have become dependent upon it whereby a miscellany of matters regarding it has been debated which the one apropos of whether tourists are to be considered accountable for respecting the destinations norms or not has had been a contentious one though from my vantage point justifications made upon lying the responsibility on tourists sound cogent.
Notwithstanding the fact that the principal aim of a holidaymaker is one of relaxing and getting rid of the everyday hectic life does not justify any propensity towards paucity of heed regarding destination's conventions since first and foremost it's the habitat of many and and they shall act as an guest there who not only will not harm its ambience but respect if fully.
Moreover, the influx of the people towards particular places firstly has irritated the local populace engendering from dearth of attention concerning its regulations by tourists secondly has pushed these destinations through the verge of destruction that has culminated in its attenuation of value thereby a reduction of attendees. Ergo I tend to be in consummate accord with those whom opine that it is no one but tourist's responsibility to care about the place's conditions and norm.
In sum, the more holiday makers be attentive about their visiting destination the more possibility of satisfaction both for the indwellers and tourists will be experienced and more it will be reserved for later visits for others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-07 | Esmaeil949 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... does not justify any propensity towards paucity of heed regarding destinations c...
^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ns conventions since first and foremost its the habitat of many and and they shall ...
^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...st and foremost its the habitat of many and and they shall act as an guest there who no...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...bitat of many and and they shall act as an guest there who not only will not harm ...
^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ience but respect if fully. Moreover, the influx of the people towards particu...
^^
Line 8, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e places conditions and norm. In sum, the more holiday makers be attentive abo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31654676259 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11029418557 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618705035971 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.313623577 49.4020404114 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 211.142857143 106.682146367 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.7142857143 20.7667163134 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271790188763 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122419609417 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927502630557 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126261567026 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102410667278 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.0946893788 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.43 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.