Tourists damage many historical places, making them harder to preserve. What are some of the reasons for this? Suggest some ways to resolve this problem. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
In recent years, many museums and historical sites have become an attraction to tourists. However, it is an undeniable fact that they seem ignore and forget their responsibilities for protecting those places. This essay will analyze some main reasons for this phenomenon as well as solutions to this.
First of all, the causes for this tendency are varied. But I think it is mainly due to tourists and travel companies. The main reason is because tourists now lack of awareness of preserving historical values of a particular destination. They get excited when having a visit, so they forget the historical significance. In other words, travel companies are indifferent to environment problem, especially historical places, and they only concentrate on their economic growth. They do not remind tourists about their responsibilities for environment protection. Therefore, preserving historical values of many places is forgotten and neglected owing to the consciousness of each individual and organization.
However, there are solutions to this problem. One of the ways to enhance the tendency is organising comprehensive educational programs for tourists. To illustrate, tour guides can integrate these programs with exciting games to attract tourists’ attention. Besides, for travel enterprises, they have to show their customers drawbacks of their irresponsibility to the places. In other words, government action is more imperative than ever before. They should enforce each individual and companies to abide by the rules in historical destinations and have stricter environmental policies to negative activities with the areas. Thus, either individuals or organizations have measures to preserve historical sites.
In conclusion, it is clear that tourists’ unconsciousness is the main cause for harder preservation of historical values of tourist attractions. However, this issue can be tackled by illustrating the seriousness caused by their actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he main cause for harder preservation of historical values of tourist attractions...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77931034483 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.329142034 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6271793718 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2105263158 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2631578947 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235253106208 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759216960831 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647591954857 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158992990073 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397086624153 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.65 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.