Traditional lifestyle of local people in developing countries at tractor can increase the number of tourists to the countries which has the effect of preventing local people change into modern way to what extent do you agree or disagree.
In the Ultra Modern era, people completely change their lifestyle and attracting to the modern technology. Lifestyle of local people in different countries is give Nation identity. I believe many society against this statement. I fully disagree to the presented phenemenon and I intend to explain my view before reasonable conclusion can be drawn.
To initial with, Changing of old life style is better for young people, people comes to know about present Technology such as oven. It is the best thing for household and variety of oven available into the market. It is save our precious time and make roti very easy. In addition, people see the new infrastructure in our surrounding area which is completely changed than past period. I think discobar, pub, club and so one built in all the major cities which become more convenient for local community and more tourist comes there. Another strong example in this circumstances, people live luxurious life style in the present days and try to some different variety of dishes like pizza, dhosa, pasta and so on which is not related to our culture and traditions.
On the other end, if more and more people to use the modern tools so, we would not seen our culture and traditions in the next period. Many times another country see to our traditions and do abide its. We are an inevitable to preserve some old things for next generation. Otherwise, they would not know about past history such as how to live, how to eat, how to work and so on.
To sum up, my opinion on par with that not only people should not much attract with the modern area but also should maintain old our culture and traditions.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-07 | dhruv j patel | 67 | view |
- Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and Housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease to what extent do you agree or disagreef 78
- People can eat a wide variety of food from other regions As a result they are eating a lot of foreign food instead of locally produced food Do you think the advantages of eating foreign foods are more than their harms 56
- Some people say that parents have the most important role in a child s development However others argue that other things like television or friends have the most significant influence Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could Why do you think this is What can be done to change this 73
- SOME THINK THAT CLIMATE CHANGE REFORMS WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT BUSINESS OTHERS FEEL THEY ARE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BUSINESSES DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun society seems to be countable; consider using: 'many societies'.
Suggestion: many societies
...ries is give Nation identity. I believe many society against this statement. I fully disagre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: AND_SO_ONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'and so on' (="etc.")?
Suggestion: and so on
...ast period. I think discobar, pub, club and so one built in all the major cities which bec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... comes there. Another strong example in this circumstances, people live luxurious li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, in addition, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73611111111 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52807347172 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1655956554 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220015984845 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731933964992 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730517900789 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13043794149 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725251853274 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun society seems to be countable; consider using: 'many societies'.
Suggestion: many societies
...ries is give Nation identity. I believe many society against this statement. I fully disagre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: AND_SO_ONE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'and so on' (="etc.")?
Suggestion: and so on
...ast period. I think discobar, pub, club and so one built in all the major cities which bec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... comes there. Another strong example in this circumstances, people live luxurious li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, i think, in addition, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73611111111 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52807347172 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1655956554 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220015984845 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731933964992 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730517900789 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13043794149 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725251853274 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.