It is not easy to answer this question and this is a challenging problem. Every educational system has its standards in considering gender for accepting students. However, we should be an expert in this field and also specialist to assess the result of accepting students in terms of their gender.
At first, researches have shown that there are some careers that are not suitable for female not only it can physically be harmful but also it can have unpleasant effects on their fragile spirits. I think it can be acceptable because I am a woman and sometimes I see a friend that she has to work in difficult job positions and it has affected all aspects of her personal life. Every woman has the right of having healthy life and when she decides to be a mother, she is responsible for her children, and I think mothers have more important roles than fathers in nurturing the future generation and they should not get themselves in hard work and unsuitable work positions. Therefore, I extremely agree with gender discrimination in some branches of science in universities and of course my example for women can extend to male groups too because there are some job positions that can be boring for them and it wants more patience and universities should have selective choices for them too.
Secondly, sometimes, universities propose gender selections unfairly and admit students equally in majority of science branches. By doing so, they make tremendous mistakes in terms of occupying job positions with inappropriate persons and the efficiency of work will decrease greatly and it can not be compensated easily.
Overall, universities not only should consider genders in selecting some fields of study, but also they should dedicate an extra percentage to a gender that its proportion in year of their entrance is more than other gender in branches that are suitable for both of them.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely Discuss both views and five your 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, i think, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98107255521 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79419063747 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533123028391 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5359547035 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.9 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140453809877 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583815162278 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375440303158 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872812289185 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154181895368 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.