It’s sometimes agreed that the usage of modern technologies such as mobile phones, TV, computers and other devices, may cause bad consequences on community relations. I completely agree that these accessories take people’s times and avoid them from an eye-to-eye contact.
There are several reasons why I would be agreed with adverse conclusion of electronic devices to population’s link, firstly modern technologies take a lot of time to use and enjoy. When people start using them, they can’t easily put it aside. In addition, the time they spent with their partners, children or friends would be less than before. For example, when people start watching movies or news, it takes 1-2 hour of their time at least.
Secondly, when people spend their time with watching movies, playing games, chatting over the internet or taking over the phone, they avoid eye-to-eye contact and this may cause some problems, it’s proven that eye contact can reduce stress in communications. Moreover, over the eye contact meetings people can also use the body language. In conclusion, when folks talk with their phones or chat over the internet, they lose the benefit of an appointment.
Finally, I believe that bad news or violent movies do effects on people’s behavior. Furthermore, these behaviors may cause people getting away from each other.
In conclusion, I believe that E-medias have damaging repercussions on nations contacts. We spent so much time on watching news, playing games and watching movies. However, these devices speed-up our lives and make life easier.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: broerjuang
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.384 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81312353088 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.5703066452 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1428571429 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0620754300411 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255966057971 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300386149768 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373717910768 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171006129355 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.