THE USE OF MOBILE PHONES HAS INCREASE DRAMATICALLY IN RECENT YEARS. WHAT ARE THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE OF THIS TREND?
Nowadays, in an increasingly digital world, mobile phones are entwined in our daily life. In my opinion, I believe that there are both beneficial and negative aspects to this.
On the one hand, mobile phones are useful in many situations. First, with a cell phone, you will be able contact with the police, or the emergency rescue team in some emergency situations. You can also use your phone for GPS or call the 24-7 hot line whenever you are in distress. Secondly, cell phones can also be helpful for children when some events may happen at school such as tornadoes, earthquakes, or even worst: school attack. Finally, mobile phone can also use for variety of tasks in our daily life, such as play games, listen to music, surf the Internet, and for study or work. It is true that cell phones have become our modern day assistant.
On the other hand, there are several negative impacts due to the increase of mobile phones usage. It is easily to be seen family members are just glued to their phone screens rather than interacting with one another. And by that, we are creating a gap fostering a divide between ourselves. Moreover, soon many people will be addicted to phones, and these not only have impacts on our social skills and relationships but also our health. Research found that using too much mobile phone can cause a lost of 10 IQ points and can lower the quality of your sleep.
In conclusion, mobile phone has become an essential in many people daily life. I believe that it brings more good than harm. However, we should be wisely so that we can increase the benefits and avoid the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68070175439 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40949184882 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3954447994 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.375 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215133530898 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079390625221 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668902289912 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143271981142 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405127726422 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.