Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Nowadays, there is a heated argument that whether or not it is reasonable to use animals for testing the safety of drugs and cosmetics. While I concur with this perspective that this method has opened lots of doors in invention of new medicines, I believe that it is immoral to bother or kill animals and should be restricted.
On one hand, I agree that doing some experiments and researches on animals has been beneficial for mankind. Because, as per statistics, this method has saved the lives of some people who have contracted some chronic diseases. The folks who were suffering from Ebola in Africa are a case in point. A myriad of people died, and the terrible disease was going unchecked. In this situation all scientists and doctors were looking for a cure and the first remedy, which crossed their minds, was doing some experiments on animals to find a vaccine or cure. As a result, they succeeded to overcome the spread of this deadly disease. Consequently, sometimes this method is handy and could stop some calamities.
On the other hand, I also believe that animals have rights to live calmly in the globe and requirements of humans are not wise reasons for killing or bothering animals. Also according to some schools of thought, if people were thoroughly aware of the gains of the presence of animals, they would never kill these creatures. For instance it is confirmed that animals are useful for gaining fertile soil. It means that they have an indispensable impact on agriculture, Furthermore, we cannot close our eyes to the benefits which have been brought by animals, and it could be short-sighted of people to kill these creatures straightforwardly.
To put it in a nutshell, despite the fact that doing researches on animals could be helpful for humans, it had better be restricted.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-03 | ilyos khamraev | 56 | view |
2015-04-26 | Saeed2 | 80 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 70
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes? 35
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 10
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 58
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 92
Comments
Thank you so much. Could you
Thank you so much. Could you answer my following question? I want to know that in which types of essays I can use others' opinions. For instance sometimes in some essays some thing can be seen as follow: "A group of people maintain..." or " Many people believe..."
When can we use these description? In lots of exercises the topic asks us to write our solutions or opinions. How can I use others' beliefs?
I appreciate you attention.
We can't reach your question
We can't reach your question exactly, but there is a general rule: write essays according to the topic asked. and there is a pattern for your reference in 5 paragraphs:
paragraph 1: introduction -- explain in your own words about the issue and give a thesis statement at the end. Give a reasonable not a dogmatic statement.
paragraph 2: reason 1 + why reason 1 + one example + a small conclusion for this paragraph (like advantages of reason 1 or comparisons if not reason 1, 1-2 sentences).
paragraph 3: reason 2 + why reason 2 + one example + a small conclusion for this paragraph (like advantages of reason 2 or comparisons if not reason 2, 1-2 sentences).
paragraph 4: qualification -- moderate your position. This may involve a sentence beginning with "but" or "however"...
paragraph 5: conclusion -- reinforce the thesis.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Let us know if you have more questions.
animals have rights to live calmly in the globe and requirements of humans are not wise reasons for killing or bothering animals.
animals have the rights to live calmly in the globe, and the requirements of humans are not the wise reasons for killing or bothering animals.
flaws:
The third paragraph has issues. Need to give some examples like: animals can still feel pains...
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 307 350
No. of Characters: 1464 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.186 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.769 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.682 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.929 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.573 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5