Water is a natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have differing views of whether authorities should interdict the sale of water productions namely bottled water or not. Personally, I tend to partly agree with this statement by some reasons.
On the one hand, it is rational to ban the sale of bottled water. Firstly, companies should not make a profit from a natural resource. Because water is one of natural resources, it should belong to the government’s management. So citizens should be used free such resources instead of paying their fundamental demands. Secondly, the utilization of bottled water would significantly expand litter and waste problems. In fact, it is difficult to disintegrate plastic bottles from bottled water so they are agglomerated in giant landfill or dumped into bodies of water. As a consequence, this kind of sewerages is pollutants which directly contaminate fresh water in national reservoirs as well as soil environments.
On the other hand, it is unreasonable to ban the sale of bottled water. Admittedly, the consumption of bottled water conductions triggers some environmental problem but bottled water is healthier for customers than tap water. It seems evident that the bottled water companies have applied a lot of water treatment technologies namely purified and removed harmful material as well as added essential minerals. Besides, such technological cost for producing bottled water is big-tickets expense, which is necessary to fee for purchasing bottled water. Another reason is that clear tap water is unavailable for people in some regions or countries to use. Therefore, the utilization of such water is convenient for customers, which not only minimize optimally healthy problem related water demands but also is easier to be portative.
In conclusion, it seems to me that although the expanding of bottled water industry is a root of some environmental pollution, some its advantages should be considered in some extents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | dungnguyen2580 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | dungnguyen2580 | 56 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 47
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this a positive or negative situation 89
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a positive and negative development 61
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Goverments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should be considered in some extents.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43708609272 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0751589846 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3262552743 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422690159879 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157985919517 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720356845114 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257796228252 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880172045884 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.