Water is a natural resource that should always be free. Government should ban the sale of bottled water. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Water is deemed one of the most vital components for human beings to survive. Without it, everyone's life will be endangered. Although other individuals were fascinated with getting enormous profits out of it. In my perspective, together with the authorities, we would like to stop selling it. This essay will discuss the two sides of the argument.
Let us take a look at a company that sold water to a majority of the population. They got a large profit from it. In particular, in Saudi Arabia where water resources are meager, it become a practice of bottled water companies to take advantage of this scenario. They sell this at a higher price which is much more expensive than petroleum products. As a result, unprivileged individuals cannot easily procure it. Therefore, most of them got Urinary Tract Infections that would probably result in infertility.
Moreover, let us consider the Philippines with almost 30% of the population according to the National Statistics Office remained to be in poverty. The question here is, how can these people afford such things? Even though this country was flourishing with water resources yet most of that was contaminated, unless an individual will purchase a bottle of water then his health will be safe. To illustrate, with the contaminated water that most people are drinking. Most of them may experience diarrhea and loss of bowel movement if they keep on persisting in drinking this adulterated water. Therefore, these bottled water will be distributed for free. This country will be considered to be one of the healthiest places to live in.
On the other hand, when the government imposed that the selling of bottled water would be stopped. Indeed, equal distribution of this will take effect then less fortunate ones will get the chance of acquiring it for free. As a result, diseases related to water problems will decrease and a healthy community will be created.
In conclusion, if only bottled water were freely given to everyone. Companies cannot take advantage of making a profit on it both privileged and less fortunate individuals have the same chances of staying fit and healthy since they are all treated fairly and equally in their society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | dungnguyen2580 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-08 | dungnguyen2580 | 56 | view |
- The picture shows the process of growing and making products from pineapples 78
- the diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- The pie charts below shows the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 80
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 73
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... it, everyones life will be endangered. Although other individuals were fascinated with ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...ia where water resources are meager, it become a practice of bottled water companies t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05205479452 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78487995963 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564383561644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0951819464 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1739130435 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8695652174 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192085255276 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624762138034 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681055567908 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109674102209 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480378503816 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.