As we are facing more and more problems which affect the whole planet, good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Opinions diverge on whether fostering positive international relations is becoming more and more essential to address global issues these days. Although some criticize this sentiment, I starkly advocate it due to some compelling rationales.
The first reason is that establishing good relationships with other countries is vital to assisting poor children who cannot access their education, healthcare, and safety. If governments maintain their international relationships, they will be able to get financial assistance for healthcare and educational resources and enable the training of professionals from other nations to enhance children’s developmental outcomes. Moreover, addressing these issues can also help to reduce poverty and contribute to economic growth and development. For instance, consider the collaborative efforts between Vietnam and Japan, where financial aid for medication and education has significantly improved the quality of children's development.
In addition to the aforementioned concern, I also believe that maintaining international relations is crucial for preventing and managing global crises involving in natural disasters and other pandemics. This is because collaborative efforts and information sharing between nations enable governments to restrict the consequences of crises more effectively such as droughts, floods, natural disasters, and the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, these relationships also facilitates the recovery of governments severely affected by natural disasters or pandemics, allowing them to minimize rapidly the impact of crises with the financial support from other countries.
All in all, maintaining positive relationships with other countries is indispensable in addressing global challenges in terms of improving children's quality development and minimizing the effects of natural disasters and global pandemic.
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007 in grams
- The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015 56
- The chart and table below give information about what nursing graduates did after finishing their courses in the UK in 2009 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the quality of childrens development. In addition to the aforementioned concer...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.35408560311 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33760973648 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607003891051 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7130544447 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.3 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123586199061 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498102296776 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507043291763 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797000342736 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380168863674 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.26 50.2224549098 24% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.85 12.4159519038 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.