we should return to more nature methods of food production such as organic farming even if this means we produce food less efficiently

Essay topics:

we should return to more nature methods of food production, such as organic farming, even if this means we produce food less efficiently.

Nowadays, with the help of science, people can produce food with shorter time and lower cost. However, many people say we should go back to conventional method to produce food like organic farming, even if this is not an efficient way to make food. In my opinion, this is a good idea but unrealistic.
It is widely agreed that organic foods have better taste and good for health because there are no chemical factors used process of growing vegetable, or live-stocks. This is the reason why more and more people choose to eat organic food, despite of the high prices.
However, from the macro perspective, this is not a realistic idea . Firstly, the population has been increasing rapidly over the last decades, which means the demand of food is much higher than in the past. If we returned to traditional farming method, we might face the threat of food shortage. Besides, because the prices of organic foods are more expensive, many people would not be able to afford food. Thus, returning to traditional farming method would lead to food crisis. Secondly, organic farming not only takes a lot of time to producing food, but also needs a lot of labor. If many people work on farms, other industries would be under staff. This would affect negatively on the economy.
In conclusion, people could produce food naturally like in the past on a small scale, but it is unrealistic to be done on a large scale. What we should do now is inventing unharmful pesticides to help produce food more safely.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-08 thao hoang 61 view
Essays by user thao hoang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...erspective, this is not a realistic idea . Firstly, the population has been increa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51781573484 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3211299681 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486786566515 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152268101677 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113522368212 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280607967978 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690349745712 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.