As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s competitive market, it is essential for businesses to make profit to survive. Yet there are beliefs that companies should have social responsibilities along with making money. To my concern, it is important to companies to make profit, although it is not critical for them to show their social responsibilities.
It is critical for companies to profit to survive in nowadays’ market. It is a fact that business is meant to make profits because hardly can any companies are able to cover their running costs and prevent going bankrupt without a stable income. Therefore, not only to making profit, but businesses must also try to maximize them as well. Concisely, making money is an unseparated part of a business.
In the other hand, it is not essential for every company to show their responsibilities to show their responsibilities to the social as they have been under pressure in today’s highly competitive market. Their budget has been allocated in a way that maximize their profit and maintain the operation so adding up the responsibilities would damage their finance system or worse, make it collapse. It is also noticeable that developing companies have their own goal to benefit and expand themselves and they have been struggling to achieve it, let alone being responsible to the public. Only massive enterprises with a great finance resource should have social responsibilities or the need to solve public problems. Thus, government has been collecting taxes, which would be used to improve people’s life, so that companies can fulfill their responsibilities in a most effective way.
In conclusion, not every company should fulfill their social responsibilities unless they have a stable finance resource. Yet the fact that making money is critical to every business is undeniable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching with the technology available today there is no justification for it and everything should be online To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information 73
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Task 1 The table shows the rate of women participating in high ranking excutive in three companies from 1975 to 2015 61
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ical for companies to profit to survive in nowadays’ market. It is a fact that business is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2724137931 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15879573374 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496551724138 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3597284362 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.214285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251059514906 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109537355819 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637887572153 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182372804744 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273942552155 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.