As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree

It is under heated debate that apart from earning money, whether big entrepreneurs also ought to shoulder social responsibilities. In my opinion, I agree with the view that companies should not only focus on making fortune, but also be responsible for the society.
On the one hand, businesses have nothing to do with social characters. Firstly, making profits is the only target for any company, otherwise they will be charities instead of entrepreneurs. For example, if a company takes too many social responsibilities such as donating schools or hospitals, it may not able to pay their employees’ salaries, bills or housing. Moreover, it is reasonable that some companies argue they choose not to take any duties to the society since they have paid taxes to the government already. In this view, it will be too much burden for firms if they both pay taxes and are required to feed back the society.
On the other hand, however, it is responsible for companies to do something good for the society. For one thing, as some businesses receive significant support from government policies, it is their duty to pay back to the society. For example, when Huawei, a top mobile phone company in China, intended to expand their business overseas, the Chinese authorities help it build relationships with some African governments, which surely promote huawei’s sales in these areas. Therefore, no wonder people require huawei to shoulder duty for the society. For another, companies can not survive without individuals purchasing their products. Thus, for these firms, taking social responsibilities can be considered as a way of saying thank you to these supporters.
In conclusion, although there are some reasons why companies need not take social responsibilities, I hold the belief that they should absolutely attach great duty for the society.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'builds'?
Suggestion: builds
...erseas, the Chinese authorities help it build relationships with some African governm...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, for one thing, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23232323232 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15248625287 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6705057239 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2857142857 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160750300706 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644305307063 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628497657533 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106650279195 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614800459877 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.