What are the pros and cons of using public transport?
In recent times, transportation has become an indispensable part of humanity. Following that notion, society has witnessed an exponential increase in the ubiquity of using public vehicles courtesy of the high demand for commuting. Using this means of transport can be undoubtedly beneficial; however, there are possibly several downsides lurking beneath this norm. In this essay, both sides of the argument will be elucidated before drawing any further conclusion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that commuting on public transports like buses may have less security, especially when comparing with that of owning a private car. One prominent justification for this is the numerous articles reporting bus commuters being robbed as a result of not having any proper security guards on those public facilities. Not only public-transport goers may be put in a greater chance of having their belongings stolen but the minor may also face a possibility of sexual assaults, especially when buses are densely populated with commuters rushing in during peak hours. This also leads to another major worth-mentioning drawback, which is a longer commuting time. It is of great prevalence to see people getting late to their destination due to the late departure time.
On the other hand, public transport can also possess a range of advantages, one of which is helping to mitigate pollution. Notwithstanding this may not be the panacea for all the environmental problems, if people use more public transport, it can help decrease the amount of carbon dioxide emissions from cars. Moreover, as bus tickets are reasonably priced, people can be more economical and feel less of a financial burden when choosing this form of vehicle. Last but not least, as more people are using public transport, the career prospects for those in a furlough situation are high, therefore providing jobs for the unemployed and partly solving the unemployment problems.
To recapitulate, taking buses as the main medium of commuting can both be disadvantageous and beneficial. Although it can have problems like robbery or sexual assaults and is slower than most other types of wheeled transportation, public transport can help cultivate the environment and be more economical. All things considered, I firmly believe that the benefits of public vehicles outweigh the drawbacks it brings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-03 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text message face to face communication will become a thing of the past To what extent do you agree 89
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and i 84
- The charts show where people get their news and how much they trust these sources Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows how much money is spent in the budget on different sectors by the UAE government in 2000 84
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...ncrease in the ubiquity of using public vehicles courtesy of the high demand for commuti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtly solving the unemployment problems. To recapitulate, taking buses as the mai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37096774194 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06149634274 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577956989247 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7722461268 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197456189921 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698142351717 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053572495188 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128684826151 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362012910193 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.