To what extent does the Internet increase social cohesion?
Nowadays, the Internet is very important in modern life, it can help to connect people much easier in the era of technology. While everything has its negative effect, this essay will discuss two sides of this debate.
First, Internet can rob time for a face-to-face meeting, which isolates people from each other. For example, a shy teen who uses Internet a lot will always surf the net, which makes him losing social skills and real friends. Moreover, a couple who is addicted to online gaming can be arrested for child neglect. In addition, spending all morning reading emails at work can result in a lack of time for the meeting, causing a bad effect on teamwork.
However, Internet can also bring people closer together. When you are stuck at home because of the pandemic, you can not get around with your friends normally. The Internet can be used to keep in touch with them, so your relationship will hardly be affected. Furthermore, while phone calls are too expensive, the Internet can be used to stay in touch with family when studying abroad, saving lots of money for both callers. By writing emails and instant messages, the Internet is more useful than a phone if you need to write records, which might be much harder than just typing the thing you want to say and click the “send” button.
In conclusion, the Internet can create more togetherness but can also decrease social cohesion. If it’s used in the right way, it should bring many benefits to the users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-22 | qaptpa | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-22 | qaptpa | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- As housing is a basic need for people the government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- As housing is a basic need for people government should provide free housing for everyone who cannot afford it To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1975 to 2025 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 73
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8093385214 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42278444764 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5154078256 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972795847854 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395464840335 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379200590635 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645060344781 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194927569836 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8093385214 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42278444764 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5154078256 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0972795847854 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395464840335 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379200590635 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645060344781 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194927569836 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.