When a country develops it's technology, the traditional skills and way of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. Do you agree or disagree with this statement.
There is cut throat compitition among countries to become developed owing to which when nation do improvement in their technological field thus they may forget their traditional skills and way of life style. While, countless of individuals think that it is unuseful to try and keep touch with tradition. I entirely disagree with this rubic because of various reasons which are justified in forthcoming paragraphs.
It is worth considering that different types of electronic gadgets are introduced day by day because of advancement of technology. By follow this, people prefer electronic machines as compared to do work by hand due to which they die out their traditional skills as well as life skills. To epitome, handmade things are unique and attractive such as seawing. Yet, nowadays seawing machines are introduced. Therefore, people become distract from their traditional life skills because of introduction of new electronic gadgets.
On the paradoxical side, there are also few factors which are showed it is not pointless to try and keep our traditional skills alive. First and foremost, government should need to aware the youngsters to bound with tradition viz painting, seawing and many more. If people forget their skills then they are unable to live better lifestyle because the tree which leaves their roots they can't be alive. So that, parents also need to aware their children in regards to traditional skills because pupils see their parents as model role for them.
To recapitulate, there is fear in mind of people to forget their traditional skills and the way of life. However, if they aware regards that, thus they easily bound touch with their tradition and culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-13 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the male and female internet users aged 15 24 in Canada in 2000
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 67
- Online shopping is significantly increasing What effect does this have people what are the demerits and what are the job opportunities 76
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 61
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...ndividuals think that it is unuseful to try and keep touch with tradition. I entirely d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...which are showed it is not pointless to try and keep our traditional skills alive. Firs...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the tree which leaves their roots they cant be alive. So that, parents also need to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...rents also need to aware their children in regards to traditional skills because pupils see t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73329789102 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553113553114 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.074662672 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273153382839 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907937861912 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719350379001 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17312953033 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672213419788 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.