When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent you agree or disagree with the statement?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your argument with examples and relevant evidence.
The current era has witnessed a vast advancement in science and technology. Although a major proportion of people support the growth of scientific field, some believe that the ancient methods of life and tradition should be left behind. However, at the same time when we embrace new discoveries, our olden treasures of skills and knowledge are not meant to be abandoned.
In today's world, every country has to develop its own technologies or else it can be erroneous in myriad ways. Not only does the upgradation in technology uplifts the nation, it also improvises the skills of their citizens. For a developing country, a constant updation in its information technology and science sectors is important.
when a country adopts a new set of technology, it is also a prerequisite that the traditional methods should be preserved. For instance, letters has been highly replaced by emails these days, neverthless the post communication system still exists. This is because, it remarks the methods of communication used by our forerunners. In a way, they are the reminiscences of the history and culture.
If the traditional skills and ways of life degrades, along with them a surplus source of not found information also gets destroyed. There are examples in life science, where a lot of medicines were discovered from scriptures by old monks. it is the ongoing cultural events and rituals which embarks the heritage of a place.
Thus, according to me both advancement and traditions should be given equal importance. Moreover, places, skills and materials of historical and cultural significance have to be safely managed with the help of archaeological departments and museums.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | anuannam | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | Javadkalantari | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | Javadkalantari | 78 | view |
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 11
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- We live today in an electronic information age. It is easier to be connected by technology yet many people seem no closer to feeling happy in t heir lives. Discuss 84
- The burning of oil for transport especially in private cars is wasteful and environmentally irresponsible Taxation on petrol and diesel fuel should be increased to very high level to discourage the use of private cars To what extent would you support or r 76
- Climate change is now an accepted threat to our planet, but there is not enough political action to control excessive consumerism and pollution. Do you agree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he ancient methods of life and tradition should be left behind. However, at the s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...y and science sectors is important. when a country adopts a new set of technolog...
^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a lot of medicines were discovered from scriptures by old monks. it is the ongoi...
^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...scovered from scriptures by old monks. it is the ongoing cultural events and ritu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09072687124 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618518518519 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1720113272 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201352706403 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573352275859 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439569314029 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975589091697 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163320598343 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.