When designing a building, the intended use of the building should be taken in into account as important rather than the outward appearance?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Modern designers tend to emphasize the exterior of a building without taking the purpose of the building into consideration. According to some, this is the best approach, since the outer appearance of a construction plays a crucial role in impressing people. And there might be some merit in this view. Yet, in what follows it will be argued that the the design of a building should be based on its further use.
When designing a building, convenience must be prioritized over the external appearance, as it is the main thing that attracts the customers. By arranging each detail regarding the intended use of the construction in order to make the building more comfortable, the designers can please their clients. Many studies have shown that in the long run, the customers value any accommodation, that is tended to ease their daily life.
Another argument in favor of giving privilege to the interior of a building is that each building is used for a different intention. The construction of a building can be made suitable for its special purpose if the designer has a clear understanding of it. For instance, constructions aimed to be used for educational purposes require certain criterias such as the size of the rooms, the stairs, and etc. Thus, it is essential that the tended purpose of a building should be taken into account.
In conclusion, it was demonstrated that while being in charge of planning a building, the designer should keep in mind that the construction firstly needs to be comfortable and appropriate for its use. Though some people believe that the outward appearance of a building is more important, still, in my opinion, the building should be suitable for its use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-26 | lusinelusine | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000, there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.To what 67
- It is a common aspiration among people to run their own business, rather that work for an employer. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 84
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to live or study abroad 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... in what follows it will be argued that the the design of a building should be based on...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... in what follows it will be argued that the the design of a building should be based on...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 398, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...h as the size of the rooms, the stairs, and etc. Thus, it is essential that the tended p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... building should be taken into account. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uilding should be suitable for its use.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07368421053 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95105450372 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8461538462 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313224594699 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119235484065 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768532932878 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194900661215 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358418209591 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.