It is irrefutable that consumption together is a social activity. Sharing dinner together gives everyone a hence of identify. It can help ease day-to-day conflicts, as well as establish traditional and memories that can last a lifetime. Dining together is definitely significant to people of my country, India.
The first and foremost advantage of chewing together is that it creates a sense of belonging. Conversations during the feast provide opportunities for the family to bond and learn from one another. It is change to share information and news of the day, as well as give extra attention to your children and teens. clan snack foster warmth, security and love, as well as feeling of belonging. It can be unifying experience for all.
Secondly, tribe mealtime is the perfect opportunity to teach appropriate table manners, etiquette, and social skills. Parents can be perfect role models in this and children learn by following them. What is more, fare prepared and eaten at home are usually more nutritious and healthy. They contain more fruits, vegetables, and dairy products along with additional nutrients such as fiber, calcium, vitamins A and C, and folate.
Furthermore, research shows that frequent group dinners, are associated with lower rates of smoking, drinking, and illegal drug use in preteens and teenagers when compared to families that eat together two or fewer times per week. To add to it, children do better in school when they eat more meals with their parents and family.
In my country most people do value shared mealtime. However, the rapid-paced life and influence of the global culture is taking a number of away from this custom. Fortunately, a number of recent studies have shown that even in the developed countries people are realizing the essential of family meals and are downshifting. It is indeed time to bring the "family" Back to the dinner table.
To conclude, eating together is definitely an critical social activity. Chewing each other depicts between love.
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and 64
- Mobile phones have made life easier Anyone can use a mobile phone to answer work call or home calls at any place 7 days a week Do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individual and society 61
- Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today In the interest of the public health governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products Do you agree or disagree 43
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity What are the advances of a family meal Do you think eating together is important to people in your country 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clan
...a attention to your children and teens. clan snack foster warmth, security and love,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... even in the developed countries people are realizing the essential of family meals and are d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...conclude, eating together is definitely an critical social activity. Chewing each ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23619631902 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8570404602 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8322149726 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2857142857 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5238095238 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280855685716 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666129738599 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652561179851 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122968357515 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601049719955 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.