People have argued that increase science and technology which is main cause of detrimental effect on environment. Some masses emphasis on simple living life for beneficial to save environment where as other thinks science and technology gives number of solutions for saving our surrounding. I will discuss both sides in upcoming paragraph and I agree with latter notion.
Despite, modern technology and science achievement make a life easier but environment protection can not be ignore. Moreover, majority of the people use own vehicle such as cars, bike to short or long distance. As the car produce carbon dioxide gas which can not harmful for human being unless it has caused for global warming. As a result, people should use eco-friendly equipment which save our nature. For instance, bicycle is the best option to protect our surrounding because bicycle reduce the pollution and accident on the roads. Another benefit ; it is the best way to stay fit and healthy.
On the other side, there are many solutions to tackle this problem by using technology. First and foremost, recycling one of the best solutions for saving our environment. For instance, plastic bags compost approximately after hundred years. If use of right method of technology to save from catastrophic effect of plastic bags to environment when technology is vital for our nature. Science innovation new method to save surrounding with using modern equipments. Consequences, technology plays crucial role for human being for their development. This problem must be solve by people's effects.
To conclude, although, science and technology help people to adopt and even detrimental effect on nature while people need to learn how to use science and technology without any create disturbance their nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'masses'' or 'mass's', 'masse's'?
Suggestion: masses'; mass's; masse's
...detrimental effect on environment. Some masses emphasis on simple living life for bene...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...life for beneficial to save environment where as other thinks science and technology giv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...lastic bags compost approximately after hundred years. If use of right method of techno...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... technology plays crucial role for human being for their development. This proble...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80965616017 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0180987988 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4705882353 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322668525563 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966169670763 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081005322861 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209267791575 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729269945174 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.