When familiy have a meal together It is consider as social activity Do u agree that eating together is important to the people of your country

It is irrefutable that the reduction of family relation bond in human beings life in day to day lives. In the modern era, when families have food together, it is a social activity. I agree with this given notion, I will explain. My viewpoint in the upcoming paragraph.

To begin with, the favour of notion there are abundant of factors behind the rubric due meal together. First and foremost, it is clear that the families have a meal together is a crucial role in the scenario. To elaborate, it is the healing impact on doing strong relationship bond. In addition, when they are spent few time together, owing to this they understand the member together. Thus, despite the life spend happiness and increase of economy.

Furthermore, it is no doubt that gaining of population and living together is a loss in today life. Owing to this, despite individual face more difficulties in beings life. For example, why people are more time spent on technology equipment viz, mobile phone and computer compare to families. Nowadays, the upcoming generation comes in dispersion because that have not person for sharing the tension and they feel lonely.

To sum up, I strongly support this given notion. We can not neglect that it is a bad impact the life alone compare to joint families

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...uction of family relation bond in human beings life in day to day lives. In the modern...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p bond. In addition, when they are spent few time together, owing to this they un...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87214611872 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6037328875 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593607305936 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1814183471 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.1333333333 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13778671428 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041592867746 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517912372842 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721688164512 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464854874048 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.