There is a controversial idea heating a debate over whether to construct more public parks and sports amenities than shopping centres for citizens to spend their leisure time, when a new town was arranged. Correspondingly, I consider myself as an advocate of the above perspective.
In terms of providing sports facilities, this is an effective way to strengthen the city dweller’s health, which may reduce the government's budget for medical expenses in the future. Currently, many people live a sedentary lifestyle choosing to glued themselves to the screen in order to watch TV or play video games in their quality times. Conversely, if there is a more convenient way to access various kinds of sport facilities, they will be more likely to change their lifestyle and make exercise a regular part of their life.
Regarding the benefits of constructing the parks, it is also a good place for doing outdoor activities, particularly to those who are not interested in high intensity training with sport amenities. For instance, jogging or dancing in the park are common activities among elderly citizens these days. In a park with many trees, it can absorb waste gases and provide fresh air, creating a comfortable environment for inhabitants.
Furthermore, the main function of shopping centres is for people to buy various goods, but in today’s world, by the revolution of the internet, on-line shopping is becoming increasingly prevalent, which leads to the fact that the role of stores and malls seems to be weakened. In addition, large shopping centres can also include some leisures facilities such as cafes or cinema, however, these may not be as important as parks and sports centres.
In conclusion, in the process of urban planning and construction, building parks and sports facilities should be emphasized rather than shopping centres since it brings a wealth of advantage not only to the civilian but also to the social.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19365079365 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92722858188 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9985241836 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313099465547 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985358142884 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859873567741 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159990312734 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678153746345 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.