while recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion with relevant example

A considerable number of people thinks that bosses should consider qualities of workers rather than qualifications and experience while they are applying for job. I partially agree with the idea that qualities can be more important from qualifications and experience.
Firstly, Certifications and experience are significant indicator of capabilities and abilities of an individual in the rapid growing and competitive economic world. Everyone works hard for getting qualifications for better job opportunities from school years and that’s how people differ from each other when they enter business life. Without them recruitment process can be very long because of checking all abilities of participants.
On the other hand, qualifications and certificates cannot show whole skills of a person. For example, social skills or ability to(of) working in a team cannot be understandable from engineering qualifications. Additionally, qualifications needs education in the universities, courses which can be expensive for some people. Also Better qualifcations require better universities and they require more money. Therefore, in a such situation some people who have enough abilities cannot get qualifications that they deserve.
Furthemore, most companies want experienced employees. That is understandable in terms of efficiency and mastery in the profession. But skilled people who finished their education newly cannot have enough experience and they have to work for gaining experience. Therefore, sometimes experience also carries less importance.
To conclude, however, qualifications and experience is considerable factor in the work life as an identifier, there are more important qualities of an individual that can be significant in a job and achieving qualifications can be hard for some skilled people due to financial problems. Therefore, I partially agree with the idea that employers should pay more attention to the personal qualities, rather than certificates and experience.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...which can be expensive for some people. Also Better qualifcations require better uni...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91349480969 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44143349753 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6174193825 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186401700323 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658968667643 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835106695621 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125301965765 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956551046629 0.056905535591 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.