Why is the number of bikes increasing? What can be down?
Nowadays, automobiles are an issue in most of the cities, and yet pushbikes popularity is not growing, quite the opposite. In my opinion, the main reason for this situation is the soaring prices of bicycles and the danger of cycling in busy traffic. Luckily, there is a solution: introducing work-related financial incentives as well as creating cycling paths would encourage their use as a meaning of everyday transport.
Good quality bikes and a protective gear required for safe cycling are an expensive purchase, therefore many people believe it is a relatively unnecessary buy. Moreover, commuting using a bike is considered unsafe, especially after the sunset or in bad weather conditions. Car drivers are often impatient and even aggressive towards cyclists. For example, accordingly, to the Metropolitan Police's statistic, 40% of all road traffic accidents in 2019 involved pedallers.
One effective solution to increase the number of bicycles on the roads is to introduce work-related incentives. They would work as interest-free loans, paid directly to a bicycle shop supplying a bike and be taken straight from a workers wages to make sure they are not fraudulently abused. This type of scheme, called Cycle to Work, has been successfully run by a number of companies in Great Britain, including Sainsbury's. However, the number of cyclists will not increase, until new bike paths are created. They would have to be properly marked and well lit so to be usable in any weather conditions.
In conclusion, the falling number of pushbikes in the cities stems from their soaring prices as well as the hazards of commuting this way in a city not adapted for cyclist. There is a way of tackling the issue, but the approach has to bilateral: on the one side pushbikes have to be made affordable and on the other new cycling, roads must be created.
- Internet crime is increasing rapidly as more and more people are using the internet to make financial transactions What can be done to tackle this problem 89
- Since most information about culture and history can be found on the internet museums are not needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that we should invent a new language for international communication To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- Nowadays we re producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can the government do to help reduce amount of rubbish 78
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09180327869 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94035667788 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593442622951 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7192824152 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155372041754 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497404954106 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044735902672 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826606319456 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712448092793 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.