The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous?
It is true that the popularity of the Internet creates the users favorable conditions to work and study online. While I accept that this trend are advantegeous in some ways, it is my personal perspective that the disadvantegous are more highlighted.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why workers and students have a tendancy of working online. In the first place, employees and organizations could save a great deal of time and budget when working via the Internet. Indeed, while staffs are free from commuting time and traffic congestion to work places, it is not nescessary for employers to rent a large offfice. Secondly, the progress of narrowing the education gaps between areas is more feasiable thanks to Internet devices. In some unhealthy countries with backward education systems, on the ground of equiping the Internet, students are given the easier accesses to approach to advanced education programes from healthy nations. Let ‘s take Vietnam as a stark example, had it not been for Internet conection, a large number of Vietnamese students would have never kept up with MBA courses of well known universities like Harvard Business School.
On the other hand, I believe that the option of working or studying at home is unbenificial in some ways. Initially, it creates less opportunities for people to build up a strong relationship. The less staffs face-to-face communicate with their co-workers, the less they understand their team-mates. This is conducives to the detorioration in team spirit, resulting in reduction of productivities and effectiveness. Further and even more significantly, online study may cause some serious health problems. Some learners witness eye deseases as a consequence of serveral hours keeping the eyes glued on the screens. Besides, it is waves from computers and IT devices taking responsibilies for causing headaches or heart attacked to searchers.
In conclusion, although online working and studying have bright sights to users in their own ways, it seem to me that it’s drawbacks are more outweighed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...had it not been for Internet conection, a large number of Vietnamese students would have never ke...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ial in some ways. Initially, it creates less opportunities for people to build up a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun staffs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to build up a strong relationship. The less staffs face-to-face communicate with th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves to the detorioration in team spirit, resulting in reduction of productivities...
^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...t sights to users in their own ways, it seem to me that it's drawbacks are more...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30606060606 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04351815418 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59696969697 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8898275274 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13041906431 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416356528065 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353136475652 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08245375655 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309848844842 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.