The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous?
It is true that the Internet creates the users favorable conditions to work and study online. While I accept that this trend are advantageous in some ways, it is my personal perspective that the disadvantageous are more highlighted.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why workers and students have a tendency of working online. In the first place, employees and organizations could save a great deal of time and budget when working via the Internet. Indeed, while staffs are free from commuting time and traffic congestion to work places, it is not necessary for employers to rent a large office. Secondly, the progress of narrowing the education gaps between areas is more feasible thanks to Internet devices. In some unhealthy countries with backward education systems, on the ground of being equiped the Internet, students are given the easier accesses to approach to advanced education programs from healthy nations. Let ‘s take Vietnam as a stark example, had it not been for Internet connection, numerous Vietnamese students would have never kept up with MBA courses of well known universities like Harvard Business School.
On the other hand, I believe that the option of working or studying at home is unbeneficial in some ways. Initially, it creates fewer opportunities for people to build up a strong relationship. If the staffs less face-to-face communicate with their co-workers, hardly can they understand their team-mates. This is conducive to the deterioration in team spirit, resulting productivity reduction. Further and even more significantly, online study may cause some serious health problems. Some learners witness eye-diseases after several hours keeping the eyes glued on the screens. Besides, it is waves from computers and IT devices taking responsibility for causing headaches or heart attacked to searchers. Additionally, offline learning provides students countless chances to practice vital soft skills such as presentation or negotiation rather than online method. Thus, not only does e-learning have adverse impacts on users’ health, but it also eliminates opportunities of learners to master valuable soft skills.
In conclusion, although distance working and studying have bright sights to users in their own ways, it seems to me that it’s drawbacks are more outweighed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-06 | Dongz Nguyen | 84 | view |
- Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree? 89
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their every day life. What are their problems? Should government encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 84
- Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that it is more benefit to take part in sports which are played by a team, like football, while other think that taking part in individual sport, like tennis or swimming is better. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 84
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 886, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than online method. Thus, not only does e-learning have adverse impacts on users...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48066298343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00794609169 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635359116022 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8786643096 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272936363599 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772865086559 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175871300897 0.0667982634062 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130085766511 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149003482828 0.056905535591 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.