Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether enhancing the environment should be the solely performed by governments and big corporations or not has arose a strong controversy among concerning people. While I accept that stated authorities and large companies play a vital role in this implementing this task, I strongly ague that individuals are by no mean inessential.
On the one hand, the governments and profit organizations have a range of solutions to cultivate the better environment. Initially, stated authorities have the strong powers to publish the laws or policies of protecting the environments. For example, by limiting the emission level discharged from vehicles, the governments put both producers and consumers to implement, reducing air pollution. Moreover, in some countries, companies producing green or recycle/replaceable products earn incentives from tax laws to reduce financial burden, which encourages them to generated friendly environmental products. Finally, large companies with thousands of employees would be more productive in cleaning polluted areas. Hardly could an individual collect and clean a polluted part of a river, but it is obvious that a thousand staffs of profit organizations could manage to handle together.
On the other hand, individuals are able to improve the environment in some ways. Firstly, each person is minor but all citizens, in total, could give a considerable contribution reducing garbage as well as controlling prisoned chemistries threw into the environment. For instance, had it not been for the awareness of households in minimizing the use of toxics and separating used items before discharging, the environment would have been worse than current records. Further and even more importantly, individuals hold countless influence on the trend of spending on green products. In deeds, by gravitating toward more friendly goods, end users motivates producers to prioritize on products that do not threaten to the common living conditions. Thanks to this positive trend, it reduces the adverse impacts on the environments
By the ways of conclusion, I once again restate my perspective that both governments, organizations and individuals keep their own crucial roles in enhancing the environment. Only by taking actions together, could the environment become better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...rnments and big corporations or not has arose a strong controversy among concerning p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68405797101 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27889510645 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620289855072 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7781746016 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.733333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123912507901 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391624512639 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233384985584 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704369811511 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00637133801724 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.