Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Many people argue that it's not the pencil to spend money on the protection of wild animals because humans have no need for them. Personally I entirely disagree with this statement for some reasons.
To begin with, it's unreasonable to say that there is no place in this 21st century for wild animals. I do not believe that exist for humans, which means that we cannot make the decisions on the extinction of animals. In addition, I think that we do not need to exploit or destroy animals for the purposes of food or accommodation in the overpopulated situation. We have had several methods in order to exist side-by-side with animals and this should be our aim.
Also, I do not agree that wild animal protection is a waste of resources. Firstly, it's true that the protection of natural habitats ensures the survival of animals and many scientists believe it to be crucial to human life. For instance, the existence of forests can not only assist transferring from carbon dioxide to oxygen but also be a place for various kinds of animals. If we destroyed or damaged these areas, the cost to manage the result of changes could outweigh the conservation. Therefore, protecting wild animals and their natural habitats could help stabilize the earth's climate and maintain the balance of all life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that we have no right to decide the existence of any animals on the Earth. Moreover, it is vital for us to make efforts to protect wild animals and their habitats for the sustainable development purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
- In some parts of the world it s becoming increasingly popular to try to find out the history of their own family why do you think people do this Do you think it s a positive or negative development 80
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 82
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- In some countries it is increasingly popular to look into the history of one s own family Why people do that Is that a positive or negative developement 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...tural habitats could help stabilize the earths climate and maintain the balance of all...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80681818182 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7106792129 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0040961726 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251487345495 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104410017796 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111352732638 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15796261648 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195339272871 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.