Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The natural inhabitants of wild animals and their way of life have been greatly affected by us and in my opinion, we should try to take and initiate every possible step to save these wild animals.
The 21st century is the era of technological advancement, but this technological advancement does not mean that we have to alter the way of life. The lives of these wild animals have been endangered because of human and some species are on the edge of complete distinction and if necessary steps are not taken immediately, many of these species will be lost forever. humans can't give life to any animal so they do not have the right to let them be destroyed.
To keep the balance of the ecosystem, each species of the animal kingdom plays important roles and the existence of one species largely depends on upon another. To say that wild animals have no use for us is just a selfish statement and obviously, we should try to keep the natural balance for our own benefit. many useful domestic animals have evaluated from the wild species and how can we even define a wild animal since they live in their very natural environments? wild animals even play many important roles for us directly. For example, many wild animals kill lots of rats and save the farmers' crops from being eaten or destroyed by those rats.
In conclusion, we must try to preserve all the endangered and natural animals and as human, we should feel responsible to ourselves not to let any species be lost forever.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ppatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
- Some people say that governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... that we have to alter the way of life. The lives of these wild animals have been e...
^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
... of these species will be lost forever. humans cant give life to any animal so they do...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...se species will be lost forever. humans cant give life to any animal so they do not ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...he natural balance for our own benefit. many useful domestic animals have evaluated ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 471, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Wild
...ive in their very natural environments? wild animals even play many important roles ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant roles for us directly. For example, many wild animals kill lots of rats and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7072243346 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54800517645 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532319391635 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.704474049 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184270976569 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849248762069 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450040944149 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10770366111 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527226227277 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.