Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that we humans do not spend money to protect wild animals, because we do not need them. they believe that, doing this work equal waste of resource. I completely disagree with this idea.
In my opinion, it is absurd argue that wild animals have no place in 21st century. First, they are many questions that pose related to this issue, for example what happened these days that this thought come to their mind? Next, earth planet was not created only for us humans. All creatures such as wild animal have a right to live here. so, none of us do not have right deter which of God creatures should have right to live and others not.
I also disagree with this idea that protecting animal especially wild ones is a waste of resource. Although we do not have enough information about the benefits of wild animal, they certainly have many benefits for earth planet, even for us. so, it should be one of our main aims to protect them of extinction that we have caused. For implement this plan, we need money. we should see this expenditure as an investing in order to protect our planet and our lives. As a result, it can not be wasting money and resource.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide which of creation should be and other not. And I believe that we should do every thing that we can to protect wild animal from extension.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ppatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Whycould this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 56
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland from 1960 to 1995. 78
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between the years 1960 and 1995 61
- The graph shows consumption of energy in the U S since 1980 with projections through 2030 78
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...d animals, because we do not need them. they believe that, doing this work equal was...
^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... wild animal have a right to live here. so, none of us do not have right deter whi...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have right to live and others not. I also disagree with this idea that prot...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...For implement this plan, we need money. we should see this expenditure as an inves...
^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not be wasting money and resource. In conclusion, we have no right to decid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56680161943 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23245489117 2.80592935109 80% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534412955466 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2932928839 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4375 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303043724392 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105042123304 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083783266755 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187325443099 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323521707464 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.