Males and females are generally perceived`as possessing various abilities and deficiencies. I am totally in favour of precluding men and women from particular businesses with regard to their sexes. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples by discussing first why men ought to be prevented from landing in a specific occupation and secondly why females should be refused to a certain walk of life.
To begin, skeletal structures remain instrumental in the military combat tasks. Generally speaking, while most women on average are considerably shorter and smaller than men, with 45-50 percent less than the upper body strength and 25-30 percent less aerobic capacity, which become truly essentials for endurance. Not only is the female skeletal system less dense but also it is more vulnerable to breakages. Likewise, possible disruptions of a combat unit's morale can be cited as a factor for banning females in battle troops. For illustration, if women are selected as a front line in wars, the romantic relationships between males and females could cause desperate troubles in fighting abilities and subsequently subject to crushing defeats. In addition, for many, a large proportion of women would intentionally become pregnant in order to escape action duties. Therefore, it is clear that female genders need to be prohibited specifically from serving in combat roles.
Next, a male working as a nanny parallels the approach of women serving as a front line in military troops because males are actually proved to be less interested according to the studies. While job descriptions usually ask for feminine qualities such as warm, caring and empathetic, males are not usually found to share typical female characteristics. Moreover, statistically speaking, perpetrators of child molestations are more likely to be male nannies. For instance, as reported by the Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute, an estimated one in twenty teenage boys sexually abuse children compared to one teenage girl in every 3,300 females molests children. Presumably, it ascertains why child care workers seem particularly unsuitable for male sexes.
In conclusion, male and female sexuality justify especially unfit for child responsibilities and military jobs owing to the potential physical abuse and unfitting bodily structures respectively.
- Machine translation (MT) is slower and less accurate than human translation and there is no immediate or predictable likelihood of machines taking over this role from humans. Do you agree or disagree?(Write at least 250 words) 90
- The Internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize. 86
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males and females from certain profession because of their gender? 76
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005 (million). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 66
- The table below gives information about the five small companies in Britain that came top in a survey of staff conducted by a national newspaper to find out which companies are the best to work for 86
Essay evaluation report
male and female sexuality justify especially unfit
male and female sexuality justifies especially unfit
flaws:
in the introduction, it says:
by discussing first why men ought to be prevented from landing in a specific occupation and secondly why females should be refused to a certain walk of life.
while the essay actually discuses first for females while second for males.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 360 350
No. of Characters: 1960 1500
No. of Different Words: 228 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.356 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.444 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.963 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 155 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 127 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.725 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.812 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.293 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.49 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.034 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58888888889 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08980801673 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619444444444 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5256947643 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200837396253 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629367756714 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391369718016 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115971423488 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454231577111 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.