Women and men are commonly seen as having differet strenght and weaknesses. it is right to exclude males or females from certain professuins because of their gender?
It is undeniable that there have always been differences in the types of work men and women. Some people think that based on the gender,the government should be exclude certain occupasions of women and men. In my opinion, it is depends on of choice in terms of employment for both male and females.
On the one hand, everyone has dreams and jobs that that love. Some people want to become a tailor, others like becoming a pilot or police officer. In my countries, everyone suppose that tailors is a work suitable for women because they think that females are always clever and meticulous. So, they can tailor products to be beautiful and quality. However, men can do that, meticulous and ingenious are the personality that humans can practice. They can even create better products than women. Another for example, some people believe that male should become a police officer than females because polices need to physical strength and good health to solving many problems. Nevertheless, female police officers may have greater understanding of domestic violence and better range of strategies for dealing with this problem.
On the other hand, there are many occupations only suitable for mainly by men or women. For instance, patients in hospital would probably appreciate having female nurses to look after them. It could also be argued that certain jobs requiring a great deal of physical strength, coal mining or logging should continue to be done making by men. Female nursy teachers probably have a better understanding of the needs of kids and can teach dancing or singing for them.
In conclusion, we should be encourage gender equality and respect for both males and females in terms od employment's choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-06 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the Uninated Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...me people think that based on the gender,the government should be exclude certain oc...
^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'excluded'?
Suggestion: excluded
... on the gender,the government should be exclude certain occupasions of women and men. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people believe that male should become a police officer than females because po...
^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
... for them. In conclusion, we should be encourage gender equality and respect for both ma...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04929577465 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57819584799 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6413887741 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196029315526 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654663701722 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487452317391 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1349903176 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477905238364 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.