You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Nowadays, information becomes widely approach as a result of multimedia exploration. However, they are edited before publishing due to various elements. Analyzing these factors and distinct aspects of good news versus bad news conducts a clearer feature.
First of all, the primary factors that impacts news editors is views and interactions. In other words, sensational news draw an unbelievably (unbelievable) attention to the audiences which is what many advertisers need. The main income of the press agency comes from advertisements. Therefore, journalist usually uses their strongest efforts to exploit celebrities and politicians private lives instead of deliver meaningful message or rightful information. On the other hand, several (some, uncountable noun) news is hidden from the public due to censorship which is conducted by a government. For example, the Chinese Communist Party censors information related to the persecution of Falun Gong in all over Chinese territory. In summary, dramatic and examination are the prime concerns of journalist before they publish any news on the media.
Next, people in the present day is usually overflowed with true and fake news, good and bad news. Sometimes people is distracted by an overdramatized news because they were born with curiosity in their mind. Personally, it is considered that bad news are not always "bad", they also deliver awareness timely so people can adjust their attitude to the environment and the others. Even so, providing more good news brings a handful of advantages. Many moral examples deserve our appreciation, for instance, the heros in the street rescue people from injury, accident and criminal. They would bring a brighter face to the society.
In conclusion, sensational news attract more attention than formal articles and some story is forbidden from audience. Hence, we should select carefully the source of content in any press release.
Thus, reader ought to stay tuned in front of bad news and embrace great people for a better world.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Proofreaders are commonly stressful to determine the topic which will be televised and published on the press. The shocking news such as celebrity scandals, precautions of natural disasters or acts of terrorism are regularly favored. A research over 1100 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in summary, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49050632911 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94204420407 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639240506329 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1796339975 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3157894737 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.10526315789 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0477481504308 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0150340910655 0.084324248473 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242823263676 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.025240041087 0.151304729494 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126982903301 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.