You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Television or newspaper are two of national method to inform information for people. Therefore, it does need some characteristics such as certainty, formality and fastness. Being an editor, they should understand how important to balance the terrible and terrific information to be broadcasted.
An informative news should be met at least three conditions. First is the assurance. There is no one who want to know many gossips and the one who introduced that one is also lost the reader’s faith. Second is the word usage which is not only enough formal but also suitable for everyone to read. Speed is the last factors that is influenced the editor’s choice. Even in the word “news” has this feature – new. The earth always moves, so does the life. Citizens always have demand to acquire the latest events which are happening around them.
There is a debate whether these social communicated channel should be provided more bad or good bulletins. Actually, these are two sides of social life. So they should equalize these two aspects. Let’s imagine that all the news are awful, for instances crime, rape, thief, impoverishment… People will get zero point for hope, no faith between people and maybe no co-operation would occur. Vice versa, if the bulletins are all about how amazing people are, how fantastic that doctors can save thousand of (a thousand) lives and cure every diseases and how beautiful many nations treat each others, people will never see and be warned about robberies, rape, medical failures, wars, natural resources dearth…
To sum up, being an information-connection team, which has a huge impact to the population, editors should selectively choose the best news to broadcast and weigh the pros and cons in every single word appeared in screen or paper.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
- Proofreaders are commonly stressful to determine the topic which will be televised and published on the press. The shocking news such as celebrity scandals, precautions of natural disasters or acts of terrorism are regularly favored. A research over 1100 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 63
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 498, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...re, how fantastic that doctors can save thousand of a thousand lives and cure every dise...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 692, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
..., rape, medical failures, wars, natural resources dearth… To sum up, being an inform...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, at least, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19727891156 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94655213197 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646258503401 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 120.715817496 49.4020404114 244% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10028519188 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294669670975 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275651809933 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611353549176 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136753531552 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.