Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion?
In the last few of years, the young people have been paying more attention to several crucial matters like global warming, social welfare, animal rescue and some other issues. I coincide if young generation more active and take bigger contribution than the prior generation. This text explains my view of its point.
First and foremost, I am firmly convinced youth is more open-minded in obtaining information. They only need one second to see the world by accessing the internet or another media such as television which nowadays provides a lot of information. Because of this technology advancement, they would know the newest cases and how to solve this problem. Meanwhile, the previous generations are too busy in working and tend to ould slower to obtaining news immediately, they prefer to finish their job first.
In addition, active youth prone to love the challenges. They will participate the attractive activities which never did before. Moreover, they concern to same issues due to their hobby. For example, they take a part in forest conservative because they like hiking or excursion or joining to Orang Utan rescue club because they like an animal.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that old generation also watches out for an essential issue. Some of them join to unpaid service community and become helpful to their society. Some activities such as collecting and selecting garbage or household trash are sometimes doing by moms in a living hood area.
To sum up, I agree that the youth is more active in the concerning of late occurs than the previous generation. Although the other one also has more attention in that case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-04 | Mike_Moody | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | treecbeo | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | HARPREET KAUR MAAN | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | duongthanhson | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | mary.ssherr | 76 | view |
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children) To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children) To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...te occurs than the previous generation. Although the other one also has more attention i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05454545455 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65392271649 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6204157443 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133089742661 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408507845063 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525787346437 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789636402678 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642937029629 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.