Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the rate of juvenile delinquency is increasing. Therefore, it is argued that young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement and my reasons will be explained in the paragraphs below.
There are a variety of reasons why youngsters are likely to commit more crimes. One factor contributing to this issue is the neglect of parents. In the modern era, people are getting busier than ever before, therefore they tend to leave their children unattended. Thus, no one will tell the kids which one is harmful, which one is harmless, etc. Furthermore, some parents indulge their offspring excessively, which spoils the children in the long run. As the youths are free to do whatever they want without permission from parents, they will likely participate in illegal activities both on purpose and by accident.
People who claim that juvenile individuals break the law ought to be treated like adults have their arguments. First and foremost, in this technology era, it is easy to get access to information as long as an internet connection is present. Therefore, teenagers can gain knowledge of the consequences of conducting unlawful activities. Moreover, being treated as a mature person help them bear in mind the aftermath of offending the law so they will not get up to it when they grow up. Another reason given by the supporters of this mindset is that young criminals often rely on the law to trespass but just receive a light sentence.
In summary, treating the youths like a grown man is a good measure to punish them and send warnings to those who have the intention of committing a felony. Thanks to this, society will be more peaceful and happier.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-28 nobitaa 73 view
2024-06-27 Sandeep USA 56 view
2024-06-24 buiquan 56 view
2024-06-24 buiquan 56 view
2024-06-24 buiquan 56 view
Essays by user nguvl :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93220338983 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74307045244 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5726823474 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2211603118 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683425684716 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124148266798 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146348123131 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107852936236 0.056905535591 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in summary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93220338983 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74307045244 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5726823474 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2211603118 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683425684716 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124148266798 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146348123131 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107852936236 0.056905535591 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.