Topic: The government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for a country’s development and progress.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the era of breakthroughs in technology, more and more people argue that governments should concentrate on integrating science lessons into schools as a substitute for other lessons to promote the country’s development. From my perspective, I firmly believe that the strategy of prioritizing scientific education over other subjects is not the most effective way to enhance the economy.
One major ground behind the reason why we are not totally dedicated to teaching science lessons is that could lead to a narrow-minded educational system. Although it cannot be denied that science and technology are crucial for economic growth and innovation, other subjects like Literature, History, and Arts still play an important role in helping learners develop their comprehension mindset. Japan, for instance, has a well-rounded education system, and this nation has managed to achieve technological advancements while also preserving its rich cultural heritage. This demonstrates that a balanced approach to education, where science and other subjects support each other, is much more beneficial for a country’s overall progress.
In addition, interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for addressing complicated global issues, which often require a blend of scientific knowledge and insights from social sciences, ethics, and policy studies. To give an example, tackling climate change not only involves understanding scientific data but also requires economic strategies, ethical considerations, and public policy initiatives. By investing in a diverse range of subjects, governments can equip students with the necessary skills to approach problems from different perspectives, leading to more holistic and sustainable solutions.
In conclusion, I completely disagree with the notion that government should prioritize science education over other subjects. A well-rounded education that includes both science and humanities is vital for fostering creativity, critical thinking as well as interdisciplinary collaboration, which are key factors for a nation to strengthen its development.
- Topic Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Topic New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- It is better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school and unable to find jobs after graduation What problems do you think youth unemployment will cause to the individual and society Give reasons and make some suggestions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...try’s development. From my perspective, I firmly believe that the strategy of pri...
^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ustainable solutions. In conclusion, I completely disagree with the notion tha...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07046979866 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37823476967 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.0733288004 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.454545455 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248980142551 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888966012194 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689840494646 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14081061424 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630695079177 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.