Nowadays, the young generation is inclined to utilize most of their free time in different shopping halls. Accordingly, it is concerned that this condition might have an extremely negative impact on them and the whole community. In my opinion, I totally agree with this point of view.
To begin with, one of the major issues associated with spending lots of leisure time in shopping destinations is that the young can waste their time meaninglessly. According to a survey in Vietnam, about 70 out of 100 teenagers prefer rambling with friends in an enormous shopping hall rather than learning themselves or taking care of their family members. Consequently, the Vietnamese young generation is prone to dependent on their parents' finance with a mistaken mindset about rewarding lifestyle.
Furthermore, another alarming problem is that more shopping means more waste products and more severe pollution which cause a serious impact on the social living environment. Firstly, any products bought in shopping centres are packaged in various types of wrappers including paper, plastic... After purchasing, these wrappers will immediately become masses of household trash and then exacerbate national pollution. Secondly, commuting more and more to shopping halls leads to more terrible air and noise pollution. For instance, in the last decades, Vietnam reported more serious air pollution in megacities due to more shopping malls' constructions.
In summary, people are gradually anxious about a remarkable amount of spare time wasted in shopping centres by the young generation today which negatively influence the young themselves and also the entire society. These consequences are dependent, inactive lifestyle and an immediate increase in worldwide pollution.
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 84
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- Average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories 56
- More and more people are relying on the private car as their major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on can come and suggest at least one possible solution 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in summary, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62546816479 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89970857802 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3667390616 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281794398712 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946856517519 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866091059019 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181106698346 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087441093878 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.