With the advance in modern technology, people are becoming more socially disconnected. At what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

With the advance in modern technology, people are becoming more socially disconnected. At what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern technology has made our lifestyle as if we were living on our dreamland which has some consequences good as well as bad. One of its results is a change in our social behavior. Some believe that we are getting disconnected from our society and at the same time there is another group of people who believe that our world has become a global village and now we are living in a more connected world. Let us discuss both the viewpoints one by one.
At first, people are becoming socially disconnected. During the old time when the world did not have media and other modes of communication, people used to sit together and have a conversation. There were get-togethers at homes as well as at community level on regular basis. Church meetings were part of their lives. Picnics, slumber parties, kitty parties etc. were much more frequent than now. Consequently, We used to live in a more socially connected world.
Now let us elaborate on the second viewpoint, with the invention of the telephone it became much easier to connect with others. In addition, the rise of computers changed the whole concept of networking. During old times, people had to write a letter and wait for several days in order to get an answer but in this era, communication has become easier and rapid. But we are distracted more than ever, most of us waste time browsing content we do not need consciously or unconsciously. Friends do not talk to each other while sitting in front of each other but at the same the time, comment on social media profile happily. To clarify, we have more ways to the network but we are not connected to each other but we are connected to a hypothetical world.
In my opinion, during the past, we were connected to each other than now. Networking, however, has become much more promiscuous but we are not letting it serve its purpose.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-27 Shahla 84 view
2019-01-20 yagya 56 view
Essays by user yagya :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68711656442 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67499436751 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4118984482 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4210526316 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1578947368 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176420447835 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625572974288 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790932287609 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110906752097 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461170462322 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.