All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them
Do you agree or disagree?
It is certainly true that vehicles like cars, trucks burn fossil fuels in huge amounts. Some people believe that to control the rate of pollution, these vehicles must be banned. In my opinion, I completely agree with the idea of a permanent ban on diesel and petrol cars and the supporting points will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, every single person has their own car nowadays. In contrast to the past few years, the number of cars on the roads is increased up to two-fold. The more the number of cars more the harm these vehicles are causing to the environment. The fossil fuel like petrol and diesel-burning in the car leads to the emission of Carbon Monoxide in the air which further depleting the ozone layer. For instance, the survey done by the Times of India has shown that Delhi the capital of nation India is the most polluted city due to more traffic.
Moreover, the prices of petrol and diesel are rising up. An average person whose income is not enough to run his family how can he deal with the rising prices of fuels? A petroleum car runs up to 200 kilometers if the fuel tank is full in comparison the electric car has no hurdles like filling of petrol and diesel. These electricity cars have a chargeable battery which can be changed many times and they can run more kilometers than the other cars. For example, some countries have now started using electric cars so that they can save money on buying fuels from other countries.
In conclusion, the vehicles which use fuels are dangerous to the environment and to the community health but in contrast, buying electric cars is very beneficial as these are not polluting the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69696969697 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49779006497 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6465602129 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259423166848 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888702072767 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554827303545 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158457810835 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243792534221 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.