All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
Carbon emission has increased multifold in the past few decades and one of the primary reason for this is a rise in automobiles that use petroleum and diesel. I completely agree with the replacement of these by electric cars because of electric cars more efficient and are faster.
First of all, electric cars are more effective . Use of electric cars would reduce air pollution drastically. Conventional cars produce a large number of air pollutants such as carbon dioxide, methane, propane etc. whereas electric cars do not emit any form of air pollutants. Also, electric energy, which is the fuel of electric cars, can be produced without any carbon emission. Consequences of this change are many, not only will this help improve the problem of climate change but also global health. Electric energy is an inexhaustible form of energy means it can be formed again and again and cannot be fatigued. Technological advances have invented various ways by which electricity can be obtained, for example, solar energy, hydroelectricity, geothermal energy, ocean energy etc. From sunlight to flowing water, from the heat of inside of earth to the heat of ocean, there are a plethora of ways to produce this energy.
Secondly, these cars are faster. Companies like Tesla motors have set benchmarks in this field. The car market has totally changed because of the introduction of these cars. Companies have launched electric cars in countries like China and Japan and are running successfully. These cars have the reputation of having more speed and are much more comfortable. Research and development are still going on to improve the efficiency and speed of these cars.
To conclude, electric cars are the future of the car industry. They will help decrease air pollution and other environmental concerns. Also, electric energy can be created on demand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | mohsin139 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | yagya | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | tejinder15 | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | Vibhu Khurana | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-16 | Kochhardeepak | 84 | view |
- Currently, there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 70
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.What are the advantage and disadvantage of tourist who visits such places? 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- It is argued that mobile phones and other electronic devices have no place in the classroom. To what extent you agree or disagree? 73
- You have recently switched your jobExplain to a friend•Why you changed job•Describe your new job•Tell him your other news 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of all, electric cars are more effective . Use of electric cars would reduce air p...
^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... drastically. Conventional cars produce a large number of air pollutants such as carbon dioxide, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, as to, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15946843854 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78889929901 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8717710451 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.65 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.05 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252581280331 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925611353109 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084500954045 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164817743797 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304265837505 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.